I understand, it's your decision. But we also speak about not
internal functionality, quite the opposite -
external provably fair algorithm. After all, the formula is written in your 'help' section. Right now you list some bets in 'best' tab, and not all of them pass the verification. If someone (player, investor) decides to check them, what should he think about this?
How will you deal with this minor issue?
- do nothing, wait for 'better' bets to shift the old ones out;
- remove old bets from the tab;
- remove the tab altogether;
- state in the help 'for bets with ID > XXXXX the formula is ....' but what about the previous formula?
BTW, what are the statuses of other *dice.me games. Last time I checked: one was offline, the other dead quiet.
Thanks!
Yeap, we are going to update our FAQ with next deploy that bets < ~3.8M should be verified using old hashing algorithm. It's still available at
http://rgbkey.github.io/verify/dogedice/. The difference is only in separation of data being hashed by ":". All day passwords\client seeds are the same.
With bitdice & litedice we are going to update their codebase to current version this week, we decided to merge all dicing engine into a gem and use it for different cryptocoins. Because DogeDice.me was our first (litedice is being run about a month) it receives updates first.
Regards,
DogeDice Team