Do you guys even read these coins' respective threads? It's blatantly obvious from the Monero thread that there remains a mountain of work to be done, just to achieve reasonable usability. It's comparable to Bitcoin in early 2010. Just be aware of that. For the sake of your money, please read the thread and see the volume of bugs, defecits and other issues with the code. Of course I don't expect most of you to take this advice. You'll call me a troll and continue existing in your blissful delusion, where Monero is perfect.
This is all that Monero/Cryptonote coins need(read quote below). Other than that, they're leagues ahead of any other "anon" coin out there. Right after The cryptonotes, is probably Vertcoin, at least Vertcoin uses Stealth Addresses that don't rely on a centralized trivial, mixer, that can always be DDOSed, like Darkcoin does. It's funny that you complain/lie over non existent issues in other coins, yet you fail to realize the crippling failures of the own coin you support, Darkcoin, with it's trivial coinjoin based "anonymity", it's horrid 50% instamine by it's own dev team, and it's name(darkcoin) that will Always be affiliated with drug/illegal activity + the other 101 problems it has. You try too hard rocket, making up lies won't help darkcoin...
[/b]
Are you being disingenuous or do you just suck at math? If you have twice the blockchain growth with just a tiny fraction of the transactions, what do you think will happen if you were at real volumes?
Transaction identification by prefix: this feature will let us to cut off ring signatures from blockchain that under checkpoint - save space by 30-70%(depends of mixin usage) -Crypto_Zoidberg, Boolberry
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=577267.0Whoa, I wonder what that is, I wonder if you seperate the daemon and wallet, that you can create light clients so you dont have to download the full blockchain, just like with Bitcoin!
It's funny to see that you completely ignore the other points, when you've been outed as a Liar. Lmfao.