If you play fair you can be sure to be treated fair! Like all the player who got their money back from the unfair bets they lose during this time.
I don't think that's the case.
Player "Arrogant" was playing a Martingale strategy.
I don't have the exact details, but it's something like this:
--
He lost bets 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1.6 playing 'lo'. The 0.2 bet should have won.
The house refunded the incorrect 0.2 bet only.
--
"Arrogant" ends up massively down on the deal, but if the casino wasn't (unintentionally) running a rigged game, he would never have made the bigger bets, since he was resetting on wins.
How is that fair?
The house argues "you made a losing 1.6 bet; that bet was fair; we won't refund it".
He argues "I only made the big bets because all my small bets lost; the small bets shouldn't have lost; refund the big bets".
Who is in the right here?