- I will find a stereo cable and test it with my PC<->laptop setup.
- I will use now QAM-16, and maybe even QAM-64 if the SNR will be high enough.
Roman.
Hello roman.z,etothepi and other people.
I am mostly a webdeveloper by trade, but I tinker a lot with audio as well (amongst other things, creating 100% code-generated song covers known as '
/predfate2lq]Bytebeat'), and might aspire to become a full-fledged synthesizer developer or something of the likes in the future.
This truly is a very interesting idea. I would give it a shot myself, if it were not that roman.z was already doing such great work already; I don't want to make a competition about this and rather think that it's better to collaborate.
Some thoughts I stumbled upon while thinking about from your solution:
-Are you using mono or stereo audio cables right now? From the source cpde it seems to me you're not. Most computers have a built-in stereo input/output, and this would mean that you can effectively double the amount of carrier waves, and thus double the speed.
-You might want to look into QAM instead of using QPSK/8PSK, which basically adds amplitude-shift-keying on top of the phase-key shifting, greatly enhancing the amount of constellations (and thus the amount of data throughput)
Have a nice day,
~W-M