Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: ***NEM*** Should NEM organize the second stakeholder list auditing ?
by
patmast3r
on 12/07/2014, 08:19:50 UTC

YES: NEM have many socks and second auditing is needed.
Many socks are voting.It is not fair.
[/size]

Yeah, prove it or shut the fuck up.

You know very well he can't prove it.

I can understand you guys can reach your limits with the constant questioning and accusations. Why not just passively endorse a "3rd party" audit conducted by fellow NEM enthusiasts in the community who have nothing to do with you on a personal level. As was pointed out earlier its easy for anyone to conduct most of the audit on their own, they just have to take charge.

At this point I don't care, I read the last 20 pages of the moderated thread and agree with Kod that people with skills who want to help out might better put their time to use working on NEM-related projects. If I was a programmer, well I'd make my own software for my own assets first but later I'd work on NEM stuff too.

We've seen many people claiming that there are a lot of puppets but so far noone has shown any form of proof. That's why I reacted like I did. Just post proof or shut the hell up. What's the point ?

Usually I would support projects from the community but this is something that will do nothing but make another fuzz about socks and piss people off.