you're welcome to your opinion, but that is not any information on future plans. if you are satisfied with the info as it sits, that's fine. I'm not.
you're out so I don't imagine you care. for those still in this information is useful, as it would be for those looking to invest.
Right, right. I don't mean to say they shouldn't answer to you guys. I'm out so I've washed my hands of the situation because I didn't like how things were shaping up. But from my perspective, I don't see what "future plans" you're alluding to. For PETA, the fact that they pegged units to 1gh/s and are distributing 100% of dividends now seems to suggest to me that there are no future plans to grow this fund. The situation now is you own shares that hash at 1gh/s, all revenue (less expenses) are distributed to shareholders, and that's the end of the story. I don't know what other information about the fund you could be looking for.
To my mind, the only question that seems to be outstanding is are the hosting costs being charged to unit owners reasonable, or are they needlessly sapping profit from shares?
I don't know anything about any future plans. What I'd like to know is what the business model looks like going forward forward, as far as PETA is concerned.
If it's this $/Gh model, Ok. If there are other things in the works that would be good to know also. Just looking for a concrete plan from PETA.
I don't blame anyone for jumping out. This model, if it sits as it is, is a slow decline to obsolescence. There is an assumption on my part, which is admittedly nothing but a great big assumption based only on my own instincts as to what I'd be doing in that situation, that they may be looking for ways to change to adapt to the situation. That may be the intention and it may not be. What I'd like to know is what the plan is, if there is one. If there isn't I'd like to know that too.