Education. After seeing scam after scam and then identifying the crutch in almost everyone of those scams, it came down to trust.
seriously read through bitcointalk.org there's 1000s of scam threads in which you have people proclaiming trust in the devs.
You're not supposed to have to trust the devs. Open source means you don't have to trust them. It's not a rule. There are no rules. But when you have a coin that A) has a network that is dangerously centralized. PoS coin having that large of a percentage of its coins supply on an exchange wallet is messed up. It's so much worse than Ghash.Io and such. Then B) you have coins that are secure and are open source which don't require trusting the devs that offer the same functionality except maybe a couple gimmicky centralized features ... it reeks. Sorry it does. If you're a holder learn from it.
Sorry, seeing this crap and what it could potentially lead to with other crapcoins in the future just kinda sucks.
So yeah, education is my motivation for posting.
It's supposed to be open-source, distributed not closed source and under their care. I don't get how more people arent calling this crap out.
Where is this rule that every digital currency must be open source? I know I personally prefer things open source as a general rule, however that doesn't mean every person or entity by default is not trustworthy, pick and choose your battles. With what the devs have done with this rollback has given me a lot more faith and trust in them. I don't understand your negativity with your multiple posts through this thread because people think differently than you :/