Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | First X11 | First DGW

Only if rc4 works, i hope that. but rc2 fail ad rc3 fail two times. RC4 please make me happy Grin

RC2 failing was a blessing in disguise. Great success only comes after great failures = great innovations in the protocol !!

RC3 did not fail. It was a responsible revert by the dev. Mini-forks did happen, and network consensus would have been achieved. There were clear bad intentioned actors trying to subvert the network. It was reverted because too many miners would have been hurt. The bad blocks were orphaned in a longer time than block generation, so it would end up 100% fine... except too many miners would see their mining profits DEDUCED. So Evan reverted, because miners are the most important group to secure the network. That also brought spectacular improvements. (for example, yet another innovative and brilliant spork solution instead of fork)

RC4 has not happened yet, but with 99% of pools upgraded, already at 88% MN payout, by tomorrow 97-99%, only multipools, insta-profit-dumpers and whales are pushing the price down, at extremely low volume... every day... slowly... for almost a month now... and I couldnt care less (because I have no BTC to buy more if not I'd love it!!)

Big money is obviously waiting for the fork, to jump in. Rocket launch to the moon when code is vetted and released.

Dump!! please do!!

the market has not seen the benefits of rc3, thanks for explanation, wait for RC4, we should be optimistic

Not to the market for natural reason, but definitely in the protocol, which will much better in the long run!

Miners are useless, and we are the market. Their advices have no sense. We have to discard these bad configured pools.

1% is not a problem!! With the fork, it happens instantly though.

Yes 1% is not a problem. Anyway pools may not be aware that their profitability value is not correct now... but... that's OK.