For those who are tuning into this discussion late, I think it would be useful to summarize the suspicious facts as succinctly as possible at the beginning of this thread.   If Anonibet, Anonitips or other parties involved wish to respond, either by disputing any of the facts or by agreeing but providing logical alternative explanations, they may do so.  That will allow Bitcointalk users who find this thread now or in the future to decide for themselves whether the evidence demonstrates shenanigans in Anonibet's WC contest, as well as to understand the actual scope of the accusation. 

This has become a trial by forum, so you might as well do it right.