Re: [ANN] [QRK] Quark | cPoW | PC mining | Stability | Hashcows - QRK Payouts
the thread died now we are not discussing anything related to the superblock and companion coin?
The number 1 issue is we have no developer. I think that needs to sink in with the community. There is no active developer. I don't think people grasp the full implications of a coin with no captain. I am invested in many coins and all that have had no clear leadership just die. QRK will be no different.
Qrk has no way of attracting any development team, any marketing team or any project management teams without funds.
The small teams we have doing things for qrk will have zero chance against fully motivated and funded teams other coins have.
The game looks interesting of course i will buy some shares.
A full gaming arcarde with credits bought in qrk and winnings paid out in qrk with a small 2-5% running costs charge for ROI investors would be a good start. However now qrk is not worth much it would take a huge number of qrks to finance this.
The number 1 issue is we have no developer. I think that needs to sink in with the community. There is no active developer. I don't think people grasp the full implications of a coin with no captain. I am invested in many coins and all that have had no clear leadership just die. QRK will be no different.
Qrk has no way of attracting any development team, any marketing team or any project management teams without funds.
The small teams we have doing things for qrk will have zero chance against fully motivated and funded teams other coins have.
The game looks interesting of course i will buy some shares.
A full gaming arcarde with credits bought in qrk and winnings paid out in qrk with a small 2-5% running costs charge for ROI investors would be a good start. However now qrk is not worth much it would take a huge number of qrks to finance this.
I tried to make update to version 0.9.2.1. Unsuccessfully. Task is not easy at all. Devs are much better and have much patience than me
check this https://github.com/MaxGuevara/quark092
It seems they changed text only. I made the same work before 1 week too.
I needed bitcoinunits.cpp Number 210 000 000 instead of 21 000 000
I have to change my work with that number and compile now There are much more work for fully compatibility with 0.9.2.1