obviously you missed what i was saying,
step one -> attack the person (ad hominem), step two -> change the subject, step three -> end on a soft note
continue the conversation in the direction that doesnt divert the entire topic, *or* you have nothing to add with my question to prom, so why bother fucking replying if you dont have anything to add to the topic of discussion.
i dont see some group getting all worked up about some 'forged' documents. do you have some insider information that proves their forged or something? or are you just pulling this out of your ass too.
Ah cute... the typical fallacy excuse because you got not no comeback. I did ask what is your proof that you're accusing prom's group of their lies and cover-ups? You did ask him why won't they admit to their lies... so my comment asking your evidence for your claims is very relevant to the original argument. Comprende?
Attious used forged pastebin documents to fud during his first attack which he ADMITTED was all lies because he decided to accuse prom for making him do it during his second attack just yesterday, which again using fake pastebin documents as his proof this time again? He isn't so smart after all is he? I guess you aren't so smart as well trying to support Attious in accusing prom of lies and cover-ups.