There are always a vocal minority of majority bagholders that want full PoS because they believe it increases the value of their bag. It has nothing to do with anything else besides the mistaken belief that somehow limiting supply increases demand.
It does not. All it does is drive away miners which are the major source of liquidity in a nascent coin that doesn't have much use in the marketplace.
With that second sentence, I'm not sure if you are for or against PoS.
Also, I'm not sure where you are going with the statement: "always a vocal minority of majority bagholders that want full PoS"
Sorry, but "always" implies Proof of Stake has been around for years when Poof of Stake is an infant technology.
Well, you sound defensive. If your attacks against my statements are reliant upon debating the loose use of the word "always" then you are stretching. I meant that since Blackcoin skyrocketed, there have been so many full PoS coins and other coins clamoring to go full PoS, and it's usually led by a minority of the coin community who happen to hold a majority of the current coins in circulation. Hence, they stand to gain the most from full PoS as they are effectively the gatekeepers to most current and future coins without them having to worry about losing out to increased mining interest.
PoS is not in its infancy. In cryto-terms, it's old as could be and originated with Peercoin which almost every PoS coin borrows heavily from. It will be two years old next month. Full PoS is relatively new, but so saturated in the marketplace at this point that switching to it does nothing from a demand standpoint.