IPO Magic, are you NotLambchop? I just want to make sure I address the right people and not sock puppets (if applicable) when I post.
Yes! Go on!
Re. your edit: I can not explain to you that which is readily apparent to normals for the same reason I can't explain to a rock why it is a rock--it just can't be done. You most likely don't understand this either, but that's OK--God don't make junk!
I'm sure you're gud enuf at less challenging tasks, like "investing."
Thank you. Is it correct for me to say that you are sharing your "gut" instinct?
Just to clarify my question for you. I'm asking you to explain how you are drawing the conclusion that Benny/Branny own part of each other's companies with what you've shared so far. "I can't explain to a rock why it is a rock" Sounds more like you are telling me I am dense and you cannot explain to me why I am dense. I'm asking you about this IPO, not my character or demeanor.
So to use your metaphor. I'm not asking you to explain to the rock why it is a rock. I'm asking you to explain, using the citation you have provided, how those citations prove Benny and Branny own part of each other's companies without appealing to majority or ad hom or making use of some other fallacy.
Otherwise thanks for sharing your opinion because that's all it is.