People think it's a poor decision if you didn't have money saved in it. The community is fully backing it, sorry you didn't get cheap coins from a hardcore hacker dump fella, truly sorry.
Saving coins life, prospects, peoples 100s of 1000s $/£, evading money in hands of a notorious person, proof devs act fast and actualy act >>>>> "centralized rollback criticism" most other coins have gone through in some form regardless of the fact you have some coins in the top 10 that are centralized from day 1.... bitcoin is becomes more centralized and only then will govs let it be.
The community isn't fully backing it - that's just ignorant. By saying that, you're either lying to yourself or you haven't done any research. I never would have bought into VRC after the MintPal fiasco either way, and I don't buy coins just to sell them at a profit over a short period... But, feel free to sling mud around that doesn't exist, it only proves you have nothing of value to contribute.
Most other coins have NOT gone thru anything like VRC did. How the VRC devs handled the situation was a complete first. Even the devs said as much; plenty of other high-profile community members (bitcointalk community, not the non-existent "VRC community") have said as much. Just seems to be a few sore VRC investors saying otherwise.
Bitcoin is becoming more centralized? You just lost all credibility, buddy, unless you can back that statement up? Hm? Is this your own bullshit interpretation of the NY legislation or something?