I wouldn't want to take over something that was completely faked...Obviously that would be completely idiotic, but if I could talk to the developers to see if they were close to making it work but just had to fake it to buy themselves time, that is a completely different story. I just want to get in touch with them because it is very possible that it was something that had errors in the code, and they had to fake it to buy time. I don't know. I haven't talked to them personally, so hearing third party information is never good enough for me

I just hate to see coins that had potential and legitimate communities just die out like this...but if there was NEVER a recycler, and it was entirely fake, then we still can't take third hand information over the developers' words if they are willing to admit it. Or if Vir6 can show screenshots. Upon review of shoppery, I'd accept screenshots as proof that Mast is completely faked.

Chris
i can vouch the recycler was not fake. it was working. this is the recycler on their site. i do not know about the recycler in the wallet. im not sure but i think dev shared screenshots of he was implementing in wallet. i just think the price was main cause that de-motivated them