Sorry, but before I prepare everything for such analysis it would take probably about 1-2 hours of my time. It is Sunday and I'm not planning to waste two hours for this.
You can do such analysis much faster than I can do it. Just check the transactions from original address and the transactions to change address in blockchain and calculate difference between the number of coins. What do you get? Do you think that there exists two other transactions in the blockchain (in the vicinity of your transaction) that have the same difference?
I've already done a full analysis of both sides of the transaction and although it works to a certain extent it could certainly benefit from improvement. Primarily what I stated earlier:
One area of improvement the developers could look to undertake would be to create 3 separate deposit addresses for the account that the randomized values go to. That way there is no record of the 3 randomized values going to the exact same deposit address but they will still go to the exact same account.
@Slaxt:
A serious discussion on the anonymity functionality is not FUD.I hold 4.92% of all KEY, spread across 8 wallet addresses. It is not in my own interests to spread FUD and thereby create panic in the markets. Constructive criticism on the other hand will help the developers to create better anonymous functionality in future versions.