Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | First X11 | First DGW | RC4 Testing
by
shojayxt
on 27/07/2014, 22:46:17 UTC

Snore

K. Atlas mentions DRK and tx community for donations (1:18 min)...>>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bcEryV8_i7c&feature=youtu.be

(Code received !!) ...>>
 Grin Grin  Shocked  Grin Grin

Sweet!! I love that panel ! Kristov has already "contributed" a little to the code too. This is serious business for DRK Grin

So you have a guy that has "contributed" to the code getting paid to review the code?  Wow.  That doesn't make any sense.  I thought the code was going to be reviewed by an outside party.    





Does anyone from the Darkcoin club want to address the issue of a supposedly independent individual reviewing the code having contributed to the code?

Definitely isn't an impartial review now is it?

Mr. Shojayxt...don't invest in Dark if you don't like that strategy...I'm certain K. Atlas would have some choice words for you if you are saying his review was bought for and your calling his integrity out. That whole $2000 is piss in a bucket for someone to devote time to look at code.... maybe send K. Atlas an email and tell him that he's biased.

  I guess you'll just have to wait till it goes opens source...so invest elsewhere Mr Shojayxt.

Don't try and change the subject.  As for K.Atlas, why would he have any choice words for me?  I don't know the guy and haven't called his integrity into question.

I merely asked a question regarding the code review after learning that Kristov  has already "contributed" a little to the code.  I thought the code was to be reviewed by an impartial party.  How is it impartial if the individual reviewing the code has contributed code to Darkcoin?

I'll answer for you since your incapable of answering the question yourself.

The answer is it isn't.

maybe send K. Atlas an email and tell him that he's biased.

I don't need to tell anyone anything.  If they had any contribution to Darkcoin then they are biased.  That doesn't mean that they would not conduct an honest review but for months now you guys have been talking about an outside party reviewing the code.  Now we find out that the reviewer has been involved with Darkcoin and has contributed.  Can't you see how that looks.

And stop your lame attempt to make it look like I am in some way attacking this individual.  I asked a legitimate question that you failed to answer and instead tried to make it appear that I had somehow attacked K.Atlas who I do not know and have nothing bad to say about.

One more question.  Shouldn't you be buying up that cheap DRK that weak hands are dumping instead of trying to make up stories?