"I'm going to protect your shareholders by bringing allegations against you that threaten to take all their money away and give it to a 3-letter government agency."

What a neat trick!

Let's go down the rabbit hole.


You guys complain to the SEC and some other government agency, and I get fined $15,000 for the sale of unlicensed securities. Now, my atty says that we're doing things the right way, but let's give you guys the benefit of doubt.

Who does that money come from? It would be alleged against the US based LLC, which is funded with......shareholder money. So, what you propose to do is take $15,000 directly from the shareholders by bringing allegations against the company.

Let's say somehow there's a bigger fine, say $500k.

That's enough to take the company down, sure. So what happens in those kinds of suits normally? Well, it ends up mostly in the pockets of those government agencies intended to protect the general public.

So, once again, not I , but you will have been the one to take money from shareholders. 

So, in the best interest of the shareholders, it would be that I do not answer any more questions on this thread. If my shareholder base wants me to release information, that's up to them. But at this point YOU are the biggest threat to them, not me by any means.