Are you sure that you can give impartial review, because I'm not really seeing it so far?
No, I cannot give you impartial review. How did you come to this conclusion?
Being impartial and objective would require you discussing both sides of an argument fully, which you clearly haven't
Biased is your standpoint, "prove me wrong or my words must be gospel"
You cannot expect objectivity from some random internet person. You never know what kind of (nefarious?) motives he has.
And I don't expect anyone to take anything I say for granted. People can always check things for themselves if they want. The only question is if they want to invest enough time and mental energy into this.
"Prove me wrong or my words must be gospel" does not hold in the context of computer security. The assumption in computer security is that systems are not secure unless proven otherwise. If somebody cannot rigorously prove that his security method (anonymity method) is really secure (anonymous), then you MUST assume that it is not secure (anonymous).
"Being secure" means "resistant to all known (or feasible) attacks".
I think the basic point trying to be put across to you is "give it some time". you want answers now while things are being done to provide those answers. Your motivation is suspect simply because you are constantly asking the same question and only seemingly in accordance with market price. asking questions is nothing that should be considered nefarious, but it is on record that you have asked this question... several times. Maybe wait for an answer, and if you don't receive one after the next statement from the dev, then ask it again. But repeating the same thing ad nauseam is, and should be considered, trolling. You've asked it, now kindly wait.
p.s. "I don't expect anyone to take anything I say for granted", I don't think this phrase means what you think it means.
This is precisely my point, and to add a quote from the previous poster to back this up
You cannot expect objectivity from some random internet person. You never know what kind of (nefarious?) motives he has.
You are asking us to believe that you posting the same thing over and over again doesn't matter
You are also the "random internet person", and we don't know what "kind of motives he has"
By your own admission though, even if Stephen Hawking himself sent you a synthesized voice message letting you know ANY and ALL crypto anon systems was secure, you wouldn't believe him.
You don't know him personally, you only know of him, but you don't know if he is trustworthy.