DRK's value will be dependent on developing features beyond anonymity, which, as I alluded to, will not be a distinguishing feature from BTC with the advent of anonymizing wallets. I'd be interested to hear about some of these features that are on the development horizon.
Each master node is hosted on a server.
So far, over 800 decentralised servers, with proof of their readiness to serve.
What exactly do you want to host on such a decentralised platform?
Decentralised anonymous corporation stock exchange?
Decentralised markets? What do you fancy selling, or buying?
Decentralised exchanges?
Decentralised Enigma 2.0 messaging?
Decentralised etc, etc
Are you serious? A decentralised anonymous corporation stock exchange? I'm sure that the SEC and IRS are really going to approve of that.
That might fly in some third world or Eastern Bloc country but never in the United States. With impending regulation regarding Bitcoin what makes you think an anonymous coin is safe? That's why anonymous coins are just an underground fad right now. They will never gain mainstream adoption because of the anonymity that will be a catalyst for nations around the world to implement more restrictive regulations regarding cryptocurrency transactions. The reason Bitcoin will survive is because it is not anonymous and they plan on staying that way. DRK will only have a use for p2p transactions or nefarious underground websites.
You people are kidding yourselves if you think that governments around the world are not going to shut something down that allows masses of people to buy and sell, transfer and receive funds without some way for them to track those transactions to ensure that you're not money laundering, funding terrorists, or failing to pay taxes.
Don't get me wrong. True anonymity is a good thing but it's never going to be allowed. That's why Darkcoin is doomed to fail.