Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: rpietila Altcoin Observer
by
btc-mike
on 28/07/2014, 22:44:42 UTC
Ok, so the point is:

Boolberry has been extremely unfairly mined by a guy with a PGPU, who was making 5,000-7,000 Boolberry per day.

Boolberry is not the first fairly launched/accepted Cryptonote coin, it has no network effects working with it

Boolberry lacks a decent size development team

Boolberry has a really crappy name(no offense)

Basically, anyone buying Boolberry is just throwing their money out the window.


1) At least one guy mining with GPU had an advantage over CPU miners in BBR, it's undeniable.
He used this advantage to make quick profit and dump on market (largely) redistributing the coins regularly for guaranteed profit and to recoup the very rea) operating expenses.
this advantage was reduced over time with diff/scratchpad increase. The numbers you give are intentionally misrepresentative as a biased XMR supporter.
It was by no means a consistent 5,000 - 7,000 per day from inception until today. Only Christian could come forward and give you the real numbers, So I won't bother with that one.
 Bear in mind XMR also had a private GPU miner at one time, as well as private CPU miners at ~225% advantage who took 1 minute or so early on to fix the intentional crippling left over from bytecoin.

2) See fairbrix/litecoin. I won't try to argue BBR has same stickinesss XMR currently has because it clearly doesn't. XMR is orchestrated pump

3) Contrary to popular belief, BBR is not a one man show. But the developers crack on with code, not eccentricities and flowery talk. I postulate they have a deeper understanding of CN than the XMR dev team

4) agreed, it is shit.

lastly, please keep the font size normal. Big font size is usually reserved for bagholders desperately pumping a shitcoin that get their panties in a twist


1)Christian is the only person that knows the correct numbers. The only way to be sure is to examine the wallet he used while mining.

2)There is no clear winner in the first fair release argument.

Bitmonero was announced on 4/9. Bitmonero was launched 4/18. Bitmonero was taken over around 4/24 and renamed Monero.
Boolberry was announced on 4/21. Boolberry was launched on 5/17.

There was active development on Boolberry since the announce. No meaningfiul changes were made to the Bitmonero core until after the takeover.

3) According to Anonymint's post BBR has a better team size than Monero.