Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: rpietila Altcoin Observer
by
darkota
on 28/07/2014, 23:09:02 UTC
Ok, so the point is:

Boolberry has been extremely unfairly mined by a guy with a PGPU, who was making 5,000-7,000 Boolberry per day.

Boolberry is not the first fairly launched/accepted Cryptonote coin, it has no network effects working with it

Boolberry lacks a decent size development team

Boolberry has a really crappy name(no offense)

Basically, anyone buying Boolberry is just throwing their money out the window.


1) At least one guy mining with GPU had an advantage over CPU miners in BBR, it's undeniable.
He used this advantage to make quick profit and dump on market (largely) redistributing the coins regularly for guaranteed profit and to recoup the very rea) operating expenses.
this advantage was reduced over time with diff/scratchpad increase. The numbers you give are intentionally misrepresentative as a biased XMR supporter.
It was by no means a consistent 5,000 - 7,000 per day from inception until today. Only Christian could come forward and give you the real numbers, So I won't bother with that one.
 Bear in mind XMR also had a private GPU miner at one time, as well as private CPU miners at ~225% advantage who took 1 minute or so early on to fix the intentional crippling left over from bytecoin.

2) See fairbrix/litecoin. I won't try to argue BBR has same stickinesss XMR currently has because it clearly doesn't. XMR is orchestrated pump

3) Contrary to popular belief, BBR is not a one man show. But the developers crack on with code, not eccentricities and flowery talk. I postulate they have a deeper understanding of CN than the XMR dev team

4) agreed, it is shit.

lastly, please keep the font size normal. Big font size is usually reserved for bagholders desperately pumping a shitcoin that get their panties in a twist



Im not pumping anything, I just like using font size and bold to emphasize points..I assume thats why they are there... I also hold less then 30 xmr....

1) Exactly how do you know he was/has sold any of his boolberry? Oh yea, cause he just "said so", just like so many other people "said things", just to please the crowd. I highly, highly, doubt that the guy with the PGPU was selling the boolberries he instamined, im sure he holds more than half/most of them.

2) Basically, since I own not that much moneros, I can say that it hasnt even been pumped...It has an overwhemingly large supply of buy orders against the sell orders, but there hasnt been any 10x price increases so far(mintpal pump was just 1 pump, and boolberry was also pumped that day, so you can call boolberry itself an "orchestrated pump"). Basically, what you see, is people who understand what Monero brings to the table, and are happy to be apart of it. It's called being Proud....

3) I only know of 2 Boolberry developers, btc-mike and CryptoZoidberg. That's it. Incase you havent noticed, both boolberries and moneros team share each other code commits on github, so that statement you made makes no sense.

4) At least you admitted one thing(the easiest to admit to a bbr bagholder), that the name is shit.


1) Because I was buying
2) XMR buy support ~650 BTC BBR buy support ~4.5 BTC was some numbers from earlier today on poloniex. If you are suggesting BBR is the one pumped I would call you crazy.  (To be clear I am not insinuating a pump automatically means a dump is in order) I do hold both XMR and BBR. (and without sounding like I'm bragging, I'm sure considerably more XMR than you, which is funny for how passionate you are about the competition considering you've admitting your holdings are meagre) XMR is artificially inflated, or should I say the rise is accelerated relative to BBR which is organically moving on it's own technological merits and not marketing antics by bitcointalk all-stars and a team of brown-nosers who insinuate it's the only thing worthy of your attention aside from btc, and that anything else is just a cheap clone. BBR has a market cap of less than 10x that of XMR, there's no tangible explanation as to why. Fundamentally it's the stronger coin.
3) btc-mike is not an XMR developer, neither is cz the only one. I do notice they have shared commits in the past. What is surprising about that?
4) bagholder only applies when you have losses, something I don't have in BBR nor XMR. (realised and unrealised)

1) I don't believe that in the least? Why? Because looking at the previous asks/bids on boolberry, not much has been traded. So it's either you're straight up lying you did with saying the guy wasnt making 5-7k bbr per day(he was), or you did it off the books somehow in a dark alley (sarcasm)

2) Strong buy support is obviously not a pump, especially since the price has remained stable, with no large upswings or signs of a pump. That's called Demand.

3) So btc-mike isnt a developer, that means Boolberry only has 1 developer, now you cant say otherwise, because you yourself made the statement lol

4) Only thing you're right on.