all right but there must be some ground to this posa from cloak. If is was something useless it would not create a buzz like this I think, also there was a article on cryptocoinsnews although the writer was paid in cloak.. and there a lot of articles on that cryptonews site, but still I dont find anything that proves it don't work and the dev of cloak seems legit.
So why is darsend+ a better solution than posa that apparently was tested positive in the beta testing already? They say that you don't need mn for anonymity..?
lol, ok i'll bite....
I personally won't buy cloak because of the 7 day proof of work instamine. i'm not a big fan of pos rollback coins in general but i do like what bitshares x is doing with the dpos (delegated proof of stake) which can thwart rollbacks and other ppc/nxt pos issues.
Delegated Proof of Stake - Let's Talk Bitcoin Episode 129
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SdBpoRLmrbA&list=WL#t=726bitshares x titan already has anon working on mainnet and is the top pos alternative to darkcoins long proven pow algo. pow>pos
after cloaks posa was decloaked i'm really surprised people are even buying it. if you want a working anon pos coin with a well established community and known dev i would check out bitshares x.
https://darkcointalk.org/threads/cloaksend-2-0-posa-fake-or-legit.1868/