Ok, this is my last post today. I currently can't provide any numeric example because I have access only to linux laptop and I will have to ask other people to do testing for me.
Look at the one anonymous transaction. In qt client you'll see several transactions. Now go to blockchain explorer and check the outputs of these transactions (you can look at block at the whole). Now add the amounts of some of these outputs - the output should be equal to amount received by other party + some fees. Now write down the inputs and check in qt client if you have private keys for these. This is my educated guess about the principles behind this program.
This problem can't be easily rectified. See my other posts where I wrote down some formulas (like X = Y + R1+R2+..+Rn or something).
You seem to have plenty of time to spend replying here and speaking with malice against our technology but no time to back up your statements. We want to work for you, give us the information we need to take care of it, or stop fudding.
Were running our own tests as we speak, we will be documenting them.
Why don't you do the right thing and hire some competent mathematicians/cryptographers to prove (or disprove) that your anonymity method actually works?
You could also publish the results in some respected scientific journal. This will give boost to the credibility of this coin.
You seem like such a good Samaritan, maybe you could lend the cash to do so!
Well, if the pumpers can afford to hire 22 people, then hiring one additional expert shouldn't be such problem for them.
You should really stop coming to coin threads and posting FUD, yes its FUD, without even testing information out yourself. If you have proof of it not working then post it and Im sure it will be responded to by the dev team. If not then stop posting pointless programs and have other people believe that MAYBE SOMEHOW it might work.