I just think that the crippled miner story that BBR is using against XMR to be bogus too. Yes maybe some folks from Bytecoin original team had optimized slow_hash (thankful_for_today surely must have) since it seemed like an inside joke. But it wasn't intentional on tacotime's part, he had not even taken over BMR by then. Come on, it will slowly tweaked as time went on. Everyone among the early miners were more or less on the same ground using the slow hash.
Same rules apply to people bashing BBR. Tainting it because of christian developing a private miner? Completely unfair argument. I am glad he was dumping. Makes getting the coins so much easier. If there are any technical disadvantage, I hope we see that in the whitepaper review of BBR.
Somewhere my question about fair launch morphed into something else. I did not say the current dev team used it to their advantage.
My question is this - Can fair launch be used to describe Monero?
Same rules apply to people bashing BBR. Tainting it because of christian developing a private miner?
I think they likely to be quite different. My last post estimated that roughly 2% of XMR coins were mined before the public miner was un-de-optimzied. What is corresponding percentage of BBR coins? Since the emission curve is reasonable I still don't think the number is that large (compared to absurdly instamined coins -- and shills for these coins on this thread you know who you are) but it still may be higher than XMR. Or perhaps not. I haven't really been following it so I don't know.
Agreed. Saner heads say both coins have had minor issues in the beginning and corrected them as soon as as possible.