Post
Topic
Board Mining software (miners)
Re: CgminerMonitor.com - cloud monitor for all your miners!
by
jjjordan
on 03/08/2014, 20:00:07 UTC
Hey man, great job with cgminermonitor!
I like it a lot and use it all the time.
It saves me a lot of time and also has some features
that let me do stuff not available otherwise.

I also have a feature suggest and a possible bug report.
About the feature - it would be great if there is an alert that monitors
one and/or all cards acceptance rate in a miner. For example -
if any of the cards in a miner doesn't accept a new share for 20, 30, 60min etc
to send an alert. I am suggesting this since sometimes I have miners that
have cgminer frozen (no shares movement whatsoever) but they still report
some constant hash rate - no movement at all. So from dashboard view it
looks all "green", but when you go to the cgminer graphs you can see what really happens.
My description my not be very detailed so let me know if it needs further clarification.

Bug - all versions I used to sph-miner 4.1.0 the client was reporting scrypt for all algorithms -
scrypt, X11, X13 etc. So there was one set of graphs but different values for hashrate.
After I moved to sgminer 4.2.2 (v5 beta) they all (the algorithms)
show as marucoin-mod, darkcoin-mod etc and there is a graph for each algo (incl. temp, fan, accepted, etc).
That shouldn't be a problem, but the way they are visualized is such that they all start from
beginning. Example:
X11 mining - from 12am to 6am
X13 mining - from 6am to 1pm
X11 mining - from 1pm to 3pm
It will show on the 24h graph:
X11 mining - from 12am to 8am - 8hours (12a-6a is 6h and 1p to 3pm is 2h)
X13 mining - from 12am to 7am - 7hours (6a-1p is 7h)
So it looks like this:
Code:
X11
|   _______________________
| /                        |   
| |                        |   
| |                        |   
| |                        |   
|_|________________________|_____________________________________________________
 12a    2a    4a    6a    8a    10a    12a    2p    4p    6p    8p    10p   

X13
|   ____________________
| /                     |   
| |                     |   
| |                     |   
| |                     |   
|_|_____________________|________________________________________________________
 12a    2a    4a    6a    8a    10a    12a    2p    4p    6p    8p    10p   
Instead of this:
Code:
X11
|   _________________                       _____
| /                  |                     /     |
| |                  |                     |     |
| |                  |                     |     |
| |                  |                     |     |
|_|__________________|_____________________|_____|________________________________
 12a    2a    4a    6a    8a    10a    12a    2p    4p    6p    8p    10p   

X13
|                     ____________________
|                    /                     |   
|                    |                     |   
|                    |                     |   
|                    |                     |   
|____________________|_____________________|______________________________________
 12a    2a    4a    6a    8a    10a    12a    2p    4p    6p    8p    10p   
(sorry about my art skills)

So my point is - it might be better to put them all (algos) on one graph or if they are separated to
make them look more "chronological".

I can share some miners so you could take a look for both the "bug" and the feature.