Within your framework how would resource decisions be made?
I can't answer that question in a few sentences, but I can answer it in several hours of lecture, since you clearly did not watch it the first time.
In fact you lied and said you did watch it. Despite the fact that you didn't have nearly enough time to watch even the first one when you made that claim.
Anyway, enjoy!
http://vimeo.com/4041228http://vimeo.com/3998605http://vimeo.com/4041284http://vimeo.com/4135182Specifically, what form of voting or consensus forming would be used?
Those most affected by the decisions would be the ones making them. Decision making would be less central and federal, and more decentralized and local. In a word, more democratic. Transparency would be key in all things - the free flow of information is vital for the health of democracy.
What happens if one or multiple individuals disagree on a current or future decision within that framework?
We murder them and dump their bodies into the murder pits. That's what you were waiting for, right? That's what you so desperately want to hear? Just stop, economic fundamentalist, I get it. You're not truly interested in a rational discussion at all.
If you really believed in those politics you should probably drop the girlfriend...
I stopped reading there. I've been with her for over two years, and more to the point you're just being childish and petty now.
I think you're an economic fundamentalist when it comes to capitalism. I think you can't handle honest critique of it in the same way a theist can't handle honest critique about the universe and the (extremely slim) probability of the existence of god.
Oh, one more lecture you won't watch:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jfqla5O8UEo