Yes, non-aggression is absolutely vital to human existence in a post-capitalism, post-state world.
No. Nor would it be tolerable to indoctrinate children in national factory-dyslearning facilities (read: schools).
City? No thanks. Cities as you know them are an unsustainable cancer of this planet.
You state you are against violence and coercion but I await any coherent explanation of how distribution of resources will be achieved without it.
Similar to how Beliathon claims certain values are a "birth right" but can never explain how those things would be paid for, who pays, and who ensures the payment.
Typical capitalist fundamentalist, always concerned with payment first, leaving compassion as a distant second, if at all.
If you took 20% of the budget America spends on war and death each year, you could pay for healthcare for every american and provide food and shelter for every hungry and homeless american, not one human being excluded.
Now imagine if all nations did this. Now imagine it wasn't 20%, but 90% of the Murder Budget being slashed - or 100%. Imagine what our species could do then. This becomes a possibility only when the world is governed solely by reason - no room for violence and coercion there.
Or just make the richest 5% pay, they can certainly afford it, what with all the wealth they have hoarded. Take their wealth, redistribute it. The imaginary problem of money is suddenly solved.