I guess the fundamentals have not changed.

We have somehow dedicated devs but refuse to spend less than $150 US in real world money to support the price by 30% (at the time of writing). Instead of accepting that as a temporary solutions the devs chose to accuse it as pump-n-dump attempt. The video could have been a decent public stun and cost-effective marketing as well, as no one in the crypto world has done that yet. Innovation is an empty word and people are probably already sick of it.

I don't know what kind of jobs they have that can't even afford to pay off $150. All I was asking is "show your commitment".

We investors will not invest to loss money, just as miners won't mine at a loss. Please don't be Mr. Palmer #2.

Talk about useless moral hygiene... If you had one you would not have premine.

As for the marketing, I would not do a strait-forward one when this coin is in a bad shape. We all know it does not take that many R9 280's to perform a 71% attack. Marketing this coin as "secure" is like bragging about how secure your network is to a group of professional hackers when you don't really have one.

The inital page needs work as well. It does not really tell people who the devs are and the contents look as if this coin is a POS coin. If we are going to keep on getting newbies asking whether the devs is alive, then you have problems here. Financial world is not the same as acadamic world; you cannot just tell people to STFB (read the f***ing book). It's like a resume and you need to make it clear.

Maybe my last post was asking too much. $150 should sound like a much more realistic target. Please consider my solutions while there are still trolls willing to troll this thing. When they leave too your coin is real dead.

Thank you