Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos
by
Abrupto
on 09/08/2014, 18:38:18 UTC
Oblox, what's your agenda?

You know full well that Privacy Mode is a Rev 2 thing, that XC's doing XChat now, and that we'll be finishing off Privacy Mode with the final Rev 2 update LATER.

So why do you persist with this?

For heaven's sake.






My agenda is that Dan said he was going to help and continues to push it off. He agreed with all the times to troubleshoot. I'm merely giving updates that so far nothing has worked and I'm getting excuse after excuse. If someone is to ask me if XC works, my only answer to give is no, no it does not. I have yet to see these private transfers work. I'll make it a point to continue sharing my experience whenever someone mentions XC as 100% working or the only trustless anon working at the moment. At this point I have moved the majority of my coins to MP and have started liquidating. I'll continue selling into any sort of momentum as a means of exiting the majority of my holdings but leaving some incase something magical happens down the pipeline. I have no desire to crush price, but there will be stalling of upward price action until I get through my coins.

This isn't a threat or an intimidation play but rather the end result of the continued bullshit I am getting here and the backlash from a community that is suppose to be "good to each other" as stated as the first guideline in the OP.

The way I understand it is, there is a MINORITY of people who have a problem using anon transfers. Out of all the people who post in this topic I've only seen it mentioned a couple of times EVER. I believe Dan said it's due to some ISP issue but don't quote me on that.

Dan has to weigh up how best to allocate his development resources. Synch has told you what Dan is focusing on right now. If all you are going to do is continue spamming the topic with the same information you are trolling.

And fyi you write like someone trying to cause as much disturbance as possible, not someone who is genuine.

Yet Dan on at least 5 occasions has attempted to fix this issue I am having so that is why I continue bringing it up. I'm just tired of the excuses and the push backs after we agree on when we will troubleshoot things.

And for the record, I write as a concerned investor. Nothing more, nothing less. There is a reason I diversified my holdings into DRK, XC, and XMR... they all aim for a privacy coin. So far that primary reason of investing into XC has been lackluster. I don't for a second discount Dan's coding ability or experience, let alone his dedication to this project (rather apparent with all the updates), but XC doesn't fit the criteria for me to be vested in at the moment. As someone that put a substantial amount of BTC into it, it's concerning to me to continue to hold on a feature that doesn't work.

Believe what you want. Believe that I have a second account or that I have some other hidden agenda, I do not care. The community is clearly violating it's code of conduct expressed in the OP.

You're too much. Now you're only a concerned investor, whereas several weeks ago you questioned my reasons for liquidating and chastised others in the community for having xc on mp. See you later guy.