No, it would be written into the code and unalterable except by a developer fork. The reason they mature slowly is to stabilize the coin supply and prevent massive dumping. Additionally, slow coin maturation encourages investors to stay involved with the coin for the long haul, rather than just looking for a quick pump & dump. However, you should also remember that your percentage of total coin supply will not change during the initial phase of coin distribution, so your relative Core wealth remains the same no matter how many coins have matured.
But why would you want to prevent people from doing whatever the hell they want to do with their money?
This is already where you lose me.
Let the people dump, they can't dump forever... let the coins go from weak hands to strong hands.
Again: why should anyone want to prevent people from doing with THEIR money what THEY choose to do, voluntarily.
It's everybodies "god given" right to dump their money or throw it out of the window or give it away for free.
a)Why do you have a problem with this?
b)Why do you want to implement solutions that will restrict voluntary actions of people?
Seriously, from a free market perspective, this whole maneuver is horrible.
It's also not the protocols job to "encourage investors" to do anything.
This should be outside of the coin protocol NOT inside.
(Meaning: you can encourage investors anyway you like, as long as its on your free time and effort, and not some new feature of the protocol that forces us to participate if we want to or not)
Also this here...
...so your relative Core wealth remains the same no matter how many coins have matured....
... sounds like protectionism. Again... WHY should your relative core wealth stay the same... That's NOT natural.
Your wealth should be exposed to market forces and not "protected" by anybody.
Seriously, stop thinking in this statist government way.