Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Bias & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide
by
Bicknellski
on 11/08/2014, 13:53:46 UTC
Interesting.

Attack the man.

Goes without saying you seem to ignore the point of others offering you advice.

How about you work on your thread and how transparent it is and I will work on mine and as for working on the Wasp there are 54 other people you included that are members of that group. Feel free to step up and do more if you like. As for Xian01... he should go worry about BCP19 and the BFL thread seems he can't leave that mole alone.

Interesting that no one commented on the ratings. Laughable.

Maybe you should concentrate on wasp rather than proving than no one will ever be happy with any answer anyone comes up with, even one as basic as good or bad.
Amen.

The Wasp project has become a big joke to me as a result of Bicks' social-justice-warrior efforts here.

*mumbles something about glass-houses*

EDIT: More to the point and the main reason a simple thumbs up thumbs down like this is more in keeping with the consumer focus that is required here in these forums. It really seems to me that the OTHER COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE is more about being fair to the manufacturer than being responsible to the consumer. So much for listening to the community.

Refunds are significantly delayed and they have used stall tactics.  You act insulted when people question your ratings, but you choose to ignore these serious problems.  I was supposed to be refunded 3 months ago.  It's really significant actually.  And they use stall tactics.

You are not helping the little guys when you ignore this stuff.  Some of us can't afford to lose that money, and if you rate them as 'fine' they have no real reason to pay us back.  

"1 - refunds significantly delayed or not being processed at all. Includes stall tactics."  is the truth