You mean that fishbitfish.com is not provably fair?!
How could it be since it is luck based?
If you check their site you can find hash from there.
No hashes in your game.
But how it would even be possible since it is luck based?
Or at least I can't figure out how it even could be provably fair.
Hash of what??
"Provably fair" in case of fishbitfish.com means that the blockchain itself is sufficient as a proof that the game is fair.
Coinmagnets, unlike fishbitfish, works with some random factor, therefore they have to publish hashes to be provably fair.
We have no problem with coinmagnets, I wish good luck to them, I just wondered why they used "provably fair" statement as an advantage over fishbitfish.
"Hash of what??"
Exactly, of nothing, that is why this can't be provably fair.
Now this game is "Public Fair" because there is no hashes of the result before the end.
I mean this is fair, but not provably fair.
I can't find exact definition for provably fair but as I have understood there is always hashes required for
provably fair.