If you know of an ASIC with greater GH per square mm of wafer/die than HF's, please tell us all about it. Oh wait, you don't (because there isn't).
I enjoy how you use the conditional "may" even though HF's chip has been the acknowledged leader since its debut.
That's right, may. And there just might be a better chip, but, NDA's and all.
How stupid of you to compare buying ID shares to Apple. Could you possibly be more delusional, or lack more understanding of independent investing?
How stupid of you to assume that an entity trading shares on a public exchange somehow equates to being 'locked' in for a lifetime. I own AM shares too, guess what, I can go dump those any time I choose. The 3 (LOL) that I hold in RENT, guess what? I can dump those too! Only in your sad delusion filled world is what's going on here some sort of logical interpretation of the framework laid out in the original post.
Sounds like somebody invested more than they could afford to lose, and are now so desperate they will settle for a few Satoshi on the BTC.
On the contrary, what I do see is the operators withholding some assets worth recovering. Kind of like how all of the debtors are going after HF to recover funds. What I also see is that this operation is about to go into the red and I want the shareholders paid out what they're owed before people like you advocate for throwing good money after bad.
Here's a thought, if holding shares (or BS PU)s in ID is such a winner, I'll sell my shares to you at 50% of the contractual owing of 0.0016BTC per. That's right Ralph, I'll sell you all of my shares for 0.0008BTC per since you think this is such a wonderful operation.