I did not see your question. And even if I did, I "pick my battles" (choose which questions to answer) by the following criterion:
Does the answering to the question give me an excuse to deliver a message or drive home a point, intended for the general audience?
If it does not, I make a new post or new thread. If it does, I reply to the previous one.
As you noticed, this is "avoidance of the question" but hey if your time was worth as much as mine, you also would not assume a responsibility of responding to Internet trolls for free, just because they so request.
Well if you say some shit on the internet you should be willing to back it up with demonstrable, tangible evidence unless you want people to think you're just another boring, generic liar.
I don't give a shit about your time. I'm telling you your opinion means nothing to me if you can't back it up with evidence. You're simply wrong about XMR being less volatile than BTC. Now deal with it.
Furthermore, people who look to you for advice or guidance will always lose money because you are admittedly full of shit. Shame on you for pretending you understand something about anything.