Re: [ANN]Joincoin (J) ToR Anonymous All Algorithm mining! On C-CEX now trading.
"version" : 1010101,
"protocolversion" : 1001,
"walletversion" : 300,
"balance" : 2.50000000,
"blocks" : 391,
"timeoffset" : -1,
"connections" : 12,
"proxy" : "",
"pow_algo_id" : 2,
"pow_algo" : "x13",
"difficulty" : 0.15833305,
"difficulty_sha" : 2385.81132495,
"difficulty_x11" : 4.01287318,
"difficulty_x13" : 0.15833305,
"difficulty_x15" : 0.02978161,
"difficulty_scrypt" : 0.01562477,
"difficulty_nist5" : 0.20509619,
"difficulty_groestle" : 8.95962472,
"difficulty_pentablake" : 0.38569512,
"difficulty_whirlpool" : 0.84984568,
"difficulty_luffa" : 0.79904166,
"difficulty_keccak" : 0.34481761,
"difficulty_quark" : 0.02626831,
"difficulty_bastion" : 0.49461871,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1407970251,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : ""
@Dev: To give you a clue.. Check Diff and nBits ... (for the X algos)
"protocolversion" : 1001,
"walletversion" : 300,
"balance" : 2.50000000,
"blocks" : 391,
"timeoffset" : -1,
"connections" : 12,
"proxy" : "",
"pow_algo_id" : 2,
"pow_algo" : "x13",
"difficulty" : 0.15833305,
"difficulty_sha" : 2385.81132495,
"difficulty_x11" : 4.01287318,
"difficulty_x13" : 0.15833305,
"difficulty_x15" : 0.02978161,
"difficulty_scrypt" : 0.01562477,
"difficulty_nist5" : 0.20509619,
"difficulty_groestle" : 8.95962472,
"difficulty_pentablake" : 0.38569512,
"difficulty_whirlpool" : 0.84984568,
"difficulty_luffa" : 0.79904166,
"difficulty_keccak" : 0.34481761,
"difficulty_quark" : 0.02626831,
"difficulty_bastion" : 0.49461871,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1407970251,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : ""
@Dev: To give you a clue.. Check Diff and nBits ... (for the X algos)
Working quickly to fix this issue with the x algos before normal block rewards come in to play. Will have updated wallet and github asap.
Good... Next time contact a pool admin for the code review and TEST it before (every algo, not just SHA)
We tested it and they all worked but this was at diffs we could produce, sha was not the only algo we tested and if you believe that then I am sorry for your misconception.
Fix pushed to Github, compiling windows wallet now.
I can easily get diff > 3 or 4 with a single 280x @ x11/x13/x15 ...
I'll be standing clear from now on.
Sorry guys - you'll be fine.