Keeping in mind that # is a comment only, wouldn't it be better to have the comment contain hashing speed and expected watts?
Doesn't something like this
#option 'freq_value' '1406' #513GH/s 420W
#option 'chip_freq' '256.25'
#option 'timeout' '15'
end up being more useful than a comment with the frequency, when its listed under chip_freq already?
#option 'freq_value' '1406' # freq 256.25M gives 513gh/s uses 420watts
#option 'chip_freq' '256.25'
#option 'timeout' '15'
Comments should be useful, right?
see bolded above
may as well be fully clear with a comment .. we forget that there are full newbies.
long windy but clear.
what I do like is we now have a lot to pick from
256.25
250
243.25
237.5
231.25
225
218.75
212.50
206.25
200
Are you still running at 256.25?
my batch 4 run at 231.25
my batch 6 run at 237.5 and 237.5
