Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: Blowing the lid off the CryptoNote/Bytecoin scam (with the exception of Monero)
by
rethink-your-strategy
on 15/08/2014, 17:33:32 UTC
So PDF v.1 that is on the website could have been created after PDF v.2. Considering that the timespan between the two papers is almost 1 year, the first version could have been lost and then re-created from the second one, with potential mistakes of course. Who can tell! After all, it's the world with human factor in charge.

Did you even read a fucking word I wrote? The v1 whitepaper and the v2 whitepaper have bullshit dates. Here and here. If the v1 whitepaper was lost why not just publish it and say "we lost the original, but this is what it looked like"? Why take the v2 whitepaper and strip parts out of it and then wind your system date back to fake signatures on both of the fucking whitepapers?

If it was just the v1 whitepaper it would be one thing. But the v1 and the v2 whitepaper have fake dates. This is purposeful and deceitful fuckery, and there is absofuckinglutely no reason for the CryptoNote developers to have done this except to try and lend support to the Bytecoin premine scam. How can you even try and explain it as anything else?