Just so everyone knows, ATCsecure is releasing a whitepaper this weekend to explain The Tech! That will clarify all questions
a whitepaper does not solve much, I asked a very very simple question (nothing is simpler if they already implemented it):
- Can you please point to me some XC's multisig addresses and their transactions, so I can verify independently if the multisig is indeed implemented as you claimed. If I want an example from Mammthcoin, I can get it in less than 30 sec in their thread.
Can anyone do me a favor and provide me the info I want? Again nothing is simpler, if it is there alreadyWhy you need us to provide this Intel? Also asking in such a negative way is not helping in getting support from XC community
Can anyone show me XC's multisig addresses and their associated transactions?
Would these satisfy your curiosity?
-
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?62014.htm-
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?229177.htmYou're an arse for fudding instead of just downloading the wallet and trying out Privacy Mode.
m-of-m multisig? Are you drunk? What fun will you have to have m-of-m multisig?? If one guy is bad then you want the wallet is locked forever?
So, your reasoning process:
- timerland doesn't understand the point of m-of-m multisig.
- timerland doesn't bother to ask people from XC what m-of-m is used for.
- timerland simply concludes, with the foolhardiness of a drunk pullet, that the truth is not that he lacks understanding but that XC is a scam.
You're not very civil are you?
Just come and ask us questions next time instead of creating a fruitless and irritating FUD thread.
If you have further questions, you're welcome to ask,
nicely.