You conclude that whole original CN group had one goal and that is was to scam ppl out of their money, but actually world is much more complex than you suggest. I'll offer alternative scenario by assuming that not every person is the same and that within that group members had different motives for participation. Some may be interested in a technology, some in human rights, other just didn't wont in the future for their girlfriends/wifes to know where they spend all of their money, some wished to produce monetary platform they can invest in long-term in and finally some just wonted to get fruits of their labor quickly and non-transparently. It is not your only mistake that you do not see spectrum of possible motives, with in a group of ppl, but you neglect the fact that there are more repressive states in the World than one you have in the US. This whole 2y in deep web mining by small groups around the globe claim could have been an attempt to anonymise development path of CN, and i can hardly see what is wrong with that. After all, they are not the first who gave monetary platform and wanted to stay anonymous, remember Satoshi group? I couldn't care less if they come from China, India, Russia or Iran, as proven later they gave cryptographically solid platform to the rest of the World - a private one that is arguably more valuable than transparent one (in altruistic sense).
This makes no sense. It doesn't matter how oppressive your state is, lying and trying to bullshit your way around a story is not a way you engender trust. Satoshi Nakamoto managed to remain anonymous and still have a transparent, open, and fair release. Why do it any differently?
He didn't have to operate in the group i would say, or that group was smaller/more-homogeneous compared to CN group. In group there are a lot of interests, and some decisions are made as a compromise - not optimal as it turned out. I have no idea how this thing actually happened but i can understand that fuckups can happen if things are not simple.
Don't get me wrong, not just that i'm not Andrei, i'm not cryptoanithing and i've never even went to Russia. My point is that imo you are using "fancy words" to which ppl are "scared of" just to make cheap points to your claims - and that may be characterized as a form of FUD. As i said before, i do not think that is even relevant and yet you use it as an argument. I do not think high of whole CN team, he just may be in i part that i do not like, but neither you or me know that certanly so you are making this into witch hunt! Witch hunts amuses ppl but does not solve problems usually. Digesting facts solves problems.
My motive is that i think that several projects in this early stage is good for CN technology itself. With too aggressive attitude you may slow down development of the technology, and i'm sure that it is not your intention
