This is the initial meeting where they identified Monica as the responsible party (some sock puppet account asked "how could monica have so much power to delay" and that is your answer).   They also said that simon and eduardo never received more than 5 BTC total from all the revenue.   So that is in sworn testimony and should be assumed to be true unless someone proves otherwise.
And Monica is legally responsible for signing the documents (why would she do that when she must have known the level of scammy sales behavior and lying that went on in november?).  She also was privy to the contracts that were sketchy at best and the delaware LLC that "owns all the IP and gets revenue from its use YET NEVER PAID ONE DOLLAR FOR IT"?
I guess that is my biggest confusion in all of this.   Why would some professional come into this company in April and agree to take any responsibility when it is obvious that some really bad decisions were made and very obvious that many customers were lied to?   It is one thing to take a paycheck but it is another to sign anything on the part of the company.