moreover, now I see you changed m-of-m multisig to n-of-m multisig, lol, learned something new?
No I didn't. Even in my prior post - which you quoted above - I use the term "m-of-m".
Where are you getting this from?
lol, m-of-m? check the screenshot at OP? is it not clear enough?
OK I think XC people agreed finally they did not use the multisig, so please do not claim it, thanks.
Also I downloaded your client, I see the privacy mode, it uses tor network, this is completely different from multisig, it is apple to orange, lol.
Umm... what? I have consistently stated that XC uses m-of-m multisig. Even in the OP of this thread your screenshots display the phrase "m-of-m".
I have ONLY used this phrase from the beginning.
- except where I assert that XC does not use m-of-n.
And no, TOR is optional. XC's Privacy Mode uses m-of-m to mix transactions trustlessly.