Re: XC uses multisig address and transaction? The answer is NO!! Look at facts here!
And in what sense can the following deleted posts possibly be taken as inappropriate?
No, there's only one technology for multisig, there's nothing "different", or it is not multisig. Try to use some other names.
You are incorrect about this.
I repeat: you are not in a position to tell what technology XC has or has not implemented.
XC has technology that you do not know about.
Therefore you are not in a position to make the above statement.
Yes this is the truth from all the above messages.
This is an irresponsibly one-sided remark.
What possible reason would you have for deleting these?
Quote
No, there's only one technology for multisig, there's nothing "different", or it is not multisig. Try to use some other names.
You are incorrect about this.
I repeat: you are not in a position to tell what technology XC has or has not implemented.
XC has technology that you do not know about.
Therefore you are not in a position to make the above statement.
Quote
Yes this is the truth from all the above messages.
This is an irresponsibly one-sided remark.
What possible reason would you have for deleting these?
because while you are arguing and you don't even know what is multisig address and what is multisig transaction!
marseille posted Gavin Andersen's example of multisig transaction, go read it and understand it please, before repeating the same thing here!
I again request you that please on the facts, no fuds, and understand multisig before posting please.
Again here Gavin Andersen showed what is a multisig tx and how to create, sign and spend!
https://gist.github.com/gavinandresen/3966071
BTW, I thank all the fuds to pump the thread for me, appreciated
