Yes. But the coin is dying and there is a tiny window to save it by creating a Btc mixing service to get new Btc into the coin. Do it while the marketcap is large enough to handle decent volume.
So if that's what you think needs doing, why not get off your arse and do it instead of moaning that nobody is doing it for you?
Because the market is avoiding Drk like Ebola due to it being closed source.
Ozziecoin.... that is your opinion... joe public doesnt know the difference between closed source, pre-mined, ninja mined, ipo... what ever, try explaining that to my parents and friends and their like, huh? Joe public cares about utility. Darkcoin will be opened sourced, but that isnt the magic pill you think it is. We voted back in February to keep the source closed till it was fully ready and ready for a full release, not in beta or release candidates. We still stand by that.... so for example if for you its a deal breaker and others... so be it and possibly when its development is completed you may want to join in if it has utility for you.
So be it. I did my bit to bring this matter up.
Ozziecoin....keep sharing your view. It is perfectly ok to challenge and express what you think.
I believe you know that the project is going to be open source. Evan has stated that about 2,000 pages or more back, and more recently too.
I think the timing of the open source is important. I'm not sure we are there yet.
While we wait for the open source timing, Kristov Atlas will give his view. He has access to the source code. Many will accept that as middle ground. He will say if there is malware or spyware that will make darkcoins traceable or open to tracing. That is what people care about - and who else would they get to do a similar review who is not as equally qualified?
+1 I agree... ive always believed in critical thinking and asking hard questions. And we have a right to our own convictions.