I wouldn't charge too much for teleport. If the fee is high then so few people will use it that it might as well not exist. I can go for charging 1 btcd for max security setting but if the coin reaches 10 dollars or more then sending just a simple transfer would be pricey at 1 btcd per low setting teleport.
Would it be possible to charge a percent of the market cap rather than a coin amount?
anything is possible, but querying orderbooks is not good design for this
also, it is not a fee, just a requirement to have some BTCD to be able to use teleport facilities
sort of like being part of the club.
James
Ok, in that case it makes much more sense. So essentially it gives more incentive for people to buy and hold btcd as it allows them teleport options. I voted no, now that I understand it more clearly I vote yes.
Yes, just another incentive to HODL

I tend to keep coming up with such ideas.
I am just worried that if BTCD gets to three digits (fiat) it might be too expensive of a requirement. I guess we can always reduce the minimum deposit factor and this will do quite nicely to limit the M of 254 multisends. The wealthy can easily afford to keep a few hundred BTCD staking forever and most people wont need the M of 254 level privacy.
I estimate this would reduce the available trading supply of BTCD quite significantly, maybe too much. That is my concern, it might work too well and create artificial scarcity and that is not good.
James