How can you sit here and tell us this is backed by an organization which is further developing new features when you can't provide the basics required ie functioning wallet. I have supported this coin since launch with excitement about the cause and the good it can do around the world, but how long can you expect us to sit around and deal with the headache of not being able to have a functioning wallet. The wallet is the foundation for which users rely to support a coin. Maybe the organization should pursue hiring a developer that can create a 100% functioning wallet. If at this point that would even do any good. There are countless coins around and more being launched every day, all with new features and "good causes". What makes this one any different? Besides the fact that the others have functioning wallets.
Given the lack of transparency around other coinbases I think CWC has at least a little more credibility if not a huge public relations problem at the moment ;-)
I have no visibility into what arrangements have been made with the developer -- all I can offer is that I'm personally on-board to help test and build the Mac version when ready.
The fact of the matter is this stuff is harder than it looks -- and this isn't a simple knock off clone of another codebase anymore -- in a lot of ways you're asking the team to basically change the tires on a moving vehicle.
My team is just getting up to speed on the GIVEcoin base and I can tell you that its a hill climbing exercise just to get these things to compile without warnings let alone errors.
I'm not sure when Mindfox got involved but given that we're finally seeing some activity I am willing to chill a bit longer because even though I'm late to CWC I have a strong affinity for their mission.
I'm on-board to devote some of doabitofgood.com's mining rigs to help vet/test the wallet -- especially on a testnet if there is one to help build better releases?
-dvd