As part of our continuous improvement to omniwallet we are bringing a database layer to omni. This layer should make the wallet much more responsive. The addition of a database also makes integration with other apps easier.
One question that came up in a recent planning meeting was about wallet association. To make the creation of the database simple we did not plan on obscuring the obvious association between UUIDs and wallet addresses and encrypted keys. The current on the implementation contains Json files that live on disk. The files are named [uuid].json. The contents of these files are encrypted using the password you chose at sign-up. Meaning we don't have access to the contents of your wallet currently.
My question: Is it important to you as users of the Omniwallet that this association between bitcoin addresses be obscured. Or is it acceptable that a simple query using a UUID as the key would present a database return of all of the addresses associated with that UUID?
For me, the obscurity serves nothing. Returning all addresses may even help with some of the tasks I do.
Omni wallet is freaking awesome. With a little effort, that thing can be a really great tool. Anyone who ever made a transaction with MastercoinAdvisor loves Omni.
Keep up the good work. In the end, Omni Wallet can be huge. I hope you'll find the energy and resources to press on vigorously.