Character assassination? I'm stating a fact that you literally make up random fucking points. Like literally, you start taking basic information, and start twisting it in ways that other people can't even say "that's not how it works, that's not how anything works".
Look what you just said: "that's not how it works, that's not how anything works". So why do you think that people can't say, "that's not how it works, that's not how anything works?" Here you are, contradicting yourself.
What I stated was true, and relevant to the thread. You have a mental disease. That much is true. Then again, you must be right. If a doctor told you that you have a mental problem, you'll be like "nah, it's transcongnitive problem in my eyelids, I just need to do x, y, and z to feel better".
Are you ready to verify and validate this in court? This is moving from people expressing their opinions and beliefs about how things work, into the area of defamation of character.
The doctor will look at you like you're a fucking moron for making up random terms, but decides it's not worth the effort to show you wrong. He'll just nod his head and push you out the door.
Like virtually all the basic evolution propaganda, here you are basing your stuff on "if." And it is second stage basing, like the books that are based on hearsay and disclaimers. First you make up a story: "If a doctor told you ..." Then you turn it into something like fact with: "The doctor will look at you like ..."
Standard evolutionist propaganda. Thank you for helping us prove that that evolution is based on "if" and "maybe" and other disclaimers, because neither you nor they have much of any idea about what is going on.
Thanks.
