IPO is still on the cards if there is any demand for it, otherwise I'll fund the push out via alternative avenues, mainly my own funds and possibly VC's that are willing to pledge. Depends all on where the balls lay on the table at the time.
Hmm...I wouldn't say careless, they were "protected" in exactly the same manner as my own that were stolen, I was just a big target I guess an worth the effort.
Yeah there has been innovation, but nothing IMO that comes close to what we have (of course I'm biased). Whether others think the same remains to be seen in the coming months.
Lol yeah eMunie has been a troll fest that's for sure.
The whole open v's closed debate, tbh I'm happy with the choice I made to keep development closed. Some stuff would of been easier open, other stuff would of been hindered, but I guess it comes down to am *I* happy with the way things have developed, especially with all the drama, and the answer is still yes.
a fair answer - i think its still interesting, but one person can never out innovate an open market, so you should align yourself with that analogy moving forward.
it could be a little bit like a musician writing a song, then coming back months later and saying "what the fuck was i thinking"
the point is if you keep it open, the market can say "what the fuck are you thinking" as you go.
my point is in the end if the market values this entity it will only be based on the "equivalent force of information" perception.
and nothing else.