He is the sole director of GES HK. Doesn't it matter to you that he would have no money to run this company??
He does not need money to run the company. The company has money to run itself. Nilesh does not equal the company. You are making Nilesh more important for the well-being of the company than he in fact might be. Do we know if and how many shares he owns in the company? We don't. We only know that the company pays his salary. So it might be that you are building your conspiracy theories around something that you don't know.
Look at this. It will answer your questions.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/235214148/PS300016750373-01-Annual-Financials-2013-AmendedWho owns the company?
Who would be retaining the profits?
Not hard to answer those questions from the document.
No other shareholders.